Results

Real results, in real numbers.

We measure the before and the after, and the numbers are the client's own.

The numbers01
6h → 90min
to review a tenderProfessional Services
A global cost consultancy reduced a six-hour tender review to under ninety minutes with structured document checks.
Minutes
to compare optionsOccupiers
Allowed a leadership team to compare multiple property options side-by-side within minutes.
30%
more deals per analystInvestment
A private capital business rebuilt underwriting and IC prep around traceable assumptions, so analysts cover more deals.
+18%
win-rate on qualified bidsProfessional Services
A UK design and build firm reduced back-and-forth between analysts, managers and directors, with more consistent submissions.
3d → 0.5d
to underwrite a dealInvestment
A real estate investment team turned a three-day underwrite into under half a day, with source-traced packs.
~18%
space identified to releaseOccupiers
A workplace strategy team turned scattered utilisation data into a clear recommendation in days, not weeks.
Client names withheld at their request.

Every figure is a before and an after, measured on the client's own work.

We baseline how long the work takes and how consistent it is, deploy the operational system, then measure the same work again. No vanity metrics, no estimates: the numbers come from the team's own output, signed off by the client.

Operational case studies
Five steps from a slow process to a faster, traceable one.
Professional services6h → 40min
Tender review, from a day's read to a focused check.
System challenge

A six-hour manual read of every tender, under deadline, with scope risks easy to miss.

What the system identified

12 cost lines over benchmark, 3 scope gaps, and 2 clauses defining the firm's exposure.

How the system changed

The system reads the pack, checks scope and cost against benchmark, and flags risks; the reviewer checks exceptions.

Operational outcome

Reviews complete in about 40 minutes, with a sourced list of what to challenge.

Business impact

More bids assessed per week, fewer risks carried into priced work.

BeforeSix hours reading every line.
→
AfterForty minutes checking the flagged exceptions.
Investment3 days → 0.5 day
Underwriting, from a three-day build to a half-day pack.
System challenge

Each underwrite took days to model and assemble, with quality varying by analyst.

What the system identified

Exit-yield sensitivity, an unconfirmed rent-review date, and a downside case below hurdle.

How the system changed

The Deal Record is built once; model, memo and IC pack draw from it, every figure traced.

Operational outcome

An IC-ready pack in under half a day, with assumptions easy to trace and challenge.

Business impact

Around 30% more deals assessed per analyst, with packs the committee trusts.

BeforeThree days, inconsistent packs.
→
AfterHalf a day, source-traced and consistent.
Occupiersweeks → days
Portfolio review, from scattered data to a clear recommendation.
System challenge

Utilisation, surveys and lease data sat in different places; reviews took weeks.

What the system identified

Floor 4 at 23% utilisation, a 2027 consolidation window, and a partial survey to flag.

How the system changed

The system pulls the evidence together, surfaces anomalies, and drafts the option comparison.

Operational outcome

A board-ready recommendation in days, with risk signals identified in minutes.

Business impact

Around 18% of space identified to release, decisions made on clearer evidence.

BeforeWeeks assembling the picture.
→
AfterDays, with the anomalies surfaced.
What it feels like
The numbers are the easy part to measure. This is what teams notice first.
Senior people stop being the bottleneck

Review becomes checking structured reasoning and the exceptions that matter, not reading everything from scratch.

Decisions happen in days, not weeks

The work that used to wait on one person now moves on its own evidence.

Analysts spend their time thinking

Less time formatting and chasing information, more time on judgement.

Leadership sees the whole picture sooner

Consistent, traceable output the board and committee can trust.

Results

Find out what your numbers could be.

A short, fixed-fee review. Two weeks. The firms moving fastest started exactly here.

Book a review